Monday, May 27, 2024

AMD Strix Halo vs. Strix Point: Which APU is Right for You?

Thanks to an official AMD document breach, the details for AMD Strix Halo and Strix Point have surfaced.

AMD Strix point APU

With the promise of enormous performance increases, AMD Strix and AMD Strix Halo APUs based on RDNA 3.5 and Zen 5 are on the way. The specifications of the AMD Strix Point and AMD Strix Halo products, the latter of which boasts more than three times the compute units of the Radeon 780M, have now reportedly been leaked in an official document.

They know a great deal about the Strix Point and AMD Strix Halo APUs thanks to multiple leaks and rumours. For example, microsoft just published a report on the performance of the premium Strix Point SKU. Apart from disclosing that the Strix APUs will be powered by an RDNA 3+ iGPU and a Zen 5 CPU, AMD has not yet provided an official confirmation of other information like the number of compute units and cache sizes.

Thanks to a leaked AMD document that was discovered online and later discovered by HKEPC, users now appear to have official Strix Point and AMD Strix Halo specifications.

Strix Halo specifications

AMD Strix Halo: RDNA 3.5 + 16 complete Zen 5 cores

  • AMD’s next-generation flagship APU, the AMD Strix Halo, is the first to be introduced. It is chiplet-based and has a maximum of 16 Zen 5 cores split over two CCDs and 32 threads. CCDs will have 1 MB L2 and 32 MB L3 cache. So they have 64 MB L3 and 16 MB L2 cache.
  • The GPU of AMD Strix Halo‘s RDNA 3.5 iGPU has 20 WGPs or 40 CUs. For instance, the RX 7600 XT has just 32 CUs. According to leaks, the AMD Strix Halo (available on Amazon) is quicker than the RX 7600 XT.
  • Furthermore, 32 MB of MALL (Memory Attached Last Level) cache appears to be present. AMD Strix Halo APUs should benefit from having 32 MB of MALL cache because iGPUs frequently lack dedicated VRAM, which causes them to lack memory bandwidth.
  • Support for LPDDR5X-8000 RAM and an NPU with up to 60 TOPs of computing are two other noteworthy features.
  • Lastly, AMD permits the AMD Strix Halo APUs to be configured at a maximum TDP of 130 W, implying that the processors have a power budget of 70 W.

AMD Strix Point

AMD Strix Point: Zen 5 + Zen 5c hybrid design

The mainstream Strix Point APUs, in contrast to AMD Strix Halo, are said to be monolithic and use a hybrid design that combines normal Zen 5 and smaller Zen 5c cores. It appears that the CPU can handle up to 12 cores and 24 threads, with 1 MB of L2 cache allocated to each core. The entire L3 cache size will be 24 MB.

Regarding graphics, it is said that the RDNA 3+ iGPU has 8 WGP or 16 CUs without a MALL cache. Therefore, because to their reduced functionality and bandwidth constraints, the Strix Point chips will perform significantly worse than the AMD Strix Halo devices, even though users may still expect substantially higher performance than the present Radeon 780M.

Finally, the chips will range from 45 W to 65 W, and the Strix Point APU’s NPU is only anticipated to reach 50 TOPs.

AMD is anticipated to make the announcement about the Strix Point APUs later this year, perhaps in June at Computes. Thus, it won’t be too long before people learn what kind of performance the Strix chips offer.

Zen 5 and RDNA 3.5: A Look at Performance’s Future

AMD Zen 5 CPUs and RDNA 3.5 GPUs are expected to bring intriguing new features, according to leaks and roadmaps. Here are some features that potentially power next-generation computers and graphics:

Zen 5: Boosting CPUs

  • Manufacturing Leap: Zen 5 CPUs may use TSMC’s improved 4nm or next-generation 3nm technology. Performance and electricity efficiency may improve significantly.
  • Core and Thread Enhancements: Zen 4’s core count may remain at 16 cores, but better architecture may increase IPC for quicker processing. Support for faster DDR5 memory is possible.
  • AMD may improve its AI accelerators with Zen 5 to improve AI and machine learning performance.


  • Performance and functionality are improved in RDNA 3.5’s architecture.
  • GPUs with RDNA 3.5 may have faster clock speeds and greater memory than RDNA 3. Smoother gameplay and graphics-intensive chores may result.
  • Advanced Display allow: DisplayPort 2.1 could allow 8K 165Hz refresh rates and larger colour gamuts for more immersive images.

Exposing Potential Impact

The combined advances of Zen 5 and RDNA 3.5 could impact many sectors:

  • For gamers, RDNA 3.5 GPUs could improve performance at greater resolutions, pushing 4K and 8K gaming.
  • Content Creators: Zen 5’s basic performance and AI advancements may assist video editors, 3D renderers, and animators.
  • Scientific and Technical Fields: Zen 5’s processing capability could speed up genomics and climate modelling simulations and data analysis.

Note on Speculation

Remember that leaks and rumours inspired these features. They offer useful insights, but AMD confirmation is essential. To get the most accurate picture of Zen 5 and RDNA 3.5, watch AMD announcements.

Future is Bright

Zen 5 and RDNA 3.5 suggest interesting advances. Next-generation technologies could push performance and efficiency frontiers, altering computers and graphics for gamers, creators, and professionals.

Agarapu Ramesh was founder of the Govindhtech and Computer Hardware enthusiast. He interested in writing Technews articles. Working as an Editor of Govindhtech for one Year and previously working as a Computer Assembling Technician in G Traders from 2018 in India. His Education Qualification MSc.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Popular Post Would you like to receive notifications on latest updates? No Yes