Big Tech’s newest AI chatbot, Grok AI, is impressive to look at already. The AI model Grok-1, which is still in closed beta, beats ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), the free version of the program, in all four of the major artificial intelligence benchmarks, ranking fourth in terms of technical performance. But how does Grok-1 stack up against Google’s PaLM 2? Let’s compare and contrast these large language models (LLM). These are the outcomes of Elon Musk’s xAI comparison between Google Bard and Grok AI.Grok AI vs. Google Bard
Grok AI vs. Google Bard
It would be an underestimation of Google’s advantage over xAI to refer to these two AI chatbots as relatively new. The Google Bard was first revealed on February 6, 2023, and it was made available on March 21. In contrast, xAI Grok has not yet been launched despite being announced on November 5th. This recent addition to Elon Musk’s xAI company, which bills itself as a “very early Beta product” and the outcome of only “two months of training,” still has a ways to go.
But Grok from xAI is off to a better start than its rival app. In descending order, it now ranks fourth out of all the big tech foundation models, which include the three more powerful models than Grok-1: GPT-4, Claude-2, and PaLM 2. Between 0.4 to 15.1% better results were shown by the Grok-1 AI model on four important benchmarks: GSM8k, MMLU, HumanEval, and MATH.
To put it succinctly, GSM8k assesses elementary maths, whereas MATH is a more difficult form of mathematics. The other two benchmarks are completely different: HumanEval assesses computer programming skills, while MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) tests general knowledge using a multiple-choice format. These findings show that Google’s PaLM 2 model outperforms Grok-1 by a range of 5 to 17.8%. PC guide may infer that Google Bard is superior to Grok in the most objective manner.
Google and xAI: A comparison of AI chatbots
It is only right to point out that, despite being impartial and rather thorough, these four criteria are not the only significant tests an AI chatbot can pass. Their powers are essentially defined by their features; at the moment, ChatGPT has more features than any other chat bot, but Google Bard has more features than Grok.
Real-time information access over the internet, support for plugins, and computer vision image analysis are all beneficial features of conversational AIs. By looking at the training data alone, none of these can be tested. Google triumphs once more in this regard.
Alphabet, the parent company of Google, is in charge of the world’s largest free cloud computing service, which includes all Google products, including Gmail, Docs, and of course, Google Search, the largest search engine in the world. In contrast, Elon Musk, the creator of xAI, currently owns X (previously Twitter). The social media network, which has been around for a while, is a great source of data for training xAI models, such as Grok. It’s still not Google, though.
[…] era when it comes to events and digital experiences, and Google are reevaluating every aspect of how Google provide service to […]
[…] and generative AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants can answer questions, solve problems, and schedule appointments and […]
[…] Google has the potential to make an impact at this crucial point. Particularly in wealthy, high-emission countries, the UN emphasizes the importance of expedited low-carbon reforms. Google has a unique potential to make a substantial contribution here. […]
[…] will have milestones and objectives. Organizations may switch from phone-based customer support to chatbots or knowledge-base wikis. They should fix customer service concerns and boost customer happiness. For […]
[…] “Copilot” generative AI chatbot is the main feature of the Windows 11 operating system. Working as a user’s virtual […]