Sunday, July 7, 2024

GeForce RTX 2070 Super: Ultimate RDNA2 Solution

What can 2023’s GeForce RTX 2070 Super do? When RDNA2 malfunctions and Super Susi must fix it

Requesting a budget GPU from friends! Due to his experiences and efficiency, he suggested the RX 6600 with confidence, but he didn’t count on Intel because a B560 motherboard and a Radeon RX 6600 aren’t a suitable match. Super-Susi rescued people and saved the day among pals. This lyrical beginning can also be defined as a field report and benchmark marathon, which will aid others.

Perhaps one of you recalls the Office-PC with upgrade options idea he shared almost exactly two years ago. About a year later, one indicated the desire to improve the graphics card for the next cold season and to gently keep my eyes open for a suitable model from summer on.

GeForce RTX 2070 super do to the malfunctions.After examining costs and graphics card efficiency within my budget, the Radeon RX 6600 made the most sense.

He had such a model in my test inventory for a while and had similar experiences. He found an affordable RX 6600 Pulse in June. Secondhand, commercial, 14-day return. Since my RX 6600 worked fine in an old tinker box with X370 board and Ryzen 2600X CPU, and the PCIE interface (the card has only 8 lanes, but PCIE 4.0, while the board and CPU only allow PCIE 3.0) didn’t show any major drawbacks.

GeForce Rtx
image credit to igorslab

Attempt #1

A few days later, the card was on the destination desk and installed quickly with the instructions. The first starter attempt is photographed. Downloading the AMD driver causes a blank screen and no monitor signal. Despite various tries, the monitor had no signal after Windows automatically installed a graphics card driver or Radeon software.

After some study, he learned that many people had this issue, especially when a 10th-generation Intel was put on a 500 board and a Radeon 6000 graphics card was used. Before convincing my friend to change cables and test for a long time, he removed the card and readied it for return.

Attempt #2

Weeks passed with no vendor response. He was more excited than my friend and probably thought about the graphics card more. He was frustrated until the seller was contacted again two months later. This one panicked, babbled about loss report, was furious the replacement unit didn’t arrive, and wanted to send another one right away.

He did that and gave us an RX 6600 XT Hellhound, which is far quicker than the Pulse. Unfortunately, after driver installation, there was no signal. He offered to test the card in my house because the merchant may sell defective goods. He would sell it and get an equivalent if it was intact.

Even in the box with the old X370 board, which doesn’t support PCIE 4.0, the card functioned well. After comprehensive testing and finding no faults, he sold the card and got rid of it immediately. The card is now running in a Z190 system with an i7 7700, no explanation needed.

Attempt #3

After receiving Hellhound funds, the search resumed. Which alternative is questionable? He initially considered the fast RTX 3060, but it is outperformed by the 2060 and 2060 Super in several tests. The 3060 Ti cards were all over his budget, and he didn’t want to consider the older cards due to power usage. However, a touring card would indicate system compatibility.

The article at the top shows that the 2060 Super worked well with the system at the time. After numerous publications and YouTube videos, he changed my opinion and focused on the RTX 2070 Super. Used card prices dropped slightly after the last launches. He bought a 2070 Super with a never-opened warranty seal for under 200€.

Inventory

Super-Susi arrived at my house this way:

Cool, OVP seemingly intact.

The shock began when the box was opened. No cushioning or anti-static foil kept the card from floating around in the box.

However, there appears to be no physical damage, broken pieces, or scratches.

After all, the buyer located the backplate foil.

The unbroken warranty seal prompted the purchase. It indicated that no one had touched the card yet, therefore improper thermal pads or a tight or crooked cooler could have caused harm.

Functional test

He tests a new card before opening and cleaning it. A “professional” can make mistakes, so he can rule out a defect. The card was miraculously put into the Mini-ITX system, which he had ready for a lengthy essay next week.

Instant image and seamless driver installation are good signs. After rebooting, GPU-Z displays correct memory and bus speeds, so we may start. he always start with Furmark. In “cold” state up to performance limit, most faults are revealed promptly. Monitor sensor values using HWInfo and observe what occurs.

The card reached 105°C hotspot, 2200rpm fans, and throttled within a minute. Obviously, the card is soon four years old and still retains the thermal paste, which is likely dust by now.

After a brief gameplay test with the fans on full, he ruled out a major issue, let the card cool, then removed it again for the retest.

News source

agarapuramesh
agarapurameshhttps://govindhtech.com
Agarapu Ramesh was founder of the Govindhtech and Computer Hardware enthusiast. He interested in writing Technews articles. Working as an Editor of Govindhtech for one Year and previously working as a Computer Assembling Technician in G Traders from 2018 in India. His Education Qualification MSc.
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Popular Post

Govindhtech.com Would you like to receive notifications on latest updates? No Yes