CPU-Z tests fail Intel Raptor Lake Refresh i5-14600K

Latest Cinebench and CPU-Z tests fail Intel Raptor Lake Refresh i5-14600K

When compared to the Cinebench R23 and CPU-Z evaluations, which only show single-digit performance gains over the i5-13600K, the revised Cinebench 2024 methodology indicates up to a 14% boost in multi thread performance. This is in contrast to the results of the Cinebench R23 examination.

The data shown here stand in stark contrast to those obtained from the Cinebench R23 test, which may be seen here. As a direct result of employing the same P+8E core configuration as the model from the year before, the highest frequencies have only acquired a leap of 200 MHz. The minor gains are mostly the result of using the same configuration for the core that was used the year before.

A Chinese reviewer going by the name of ECSM has made public some benchmark results for the next Intel Core i5-14600K desktop central processing unit from the Raptor Lake Refresh series. These findings pertain to the processor that will be available in desktop computers. The facts that have been provided here pertain to the most recent member of the processor family’s family tree.

In an article that was published on the website Bilibili, the results of this investigation were analysed in great depth. Because this is merely an engineering example, ECSM wants to make it quite clear that the actual functionality of the product may end up being quite different from what is represented here. This is because this is only an example of how the product may be engineered. Because the real functioning of the product may end up being somewhat different from what is depicted here, this is important to keep in mind.

On the other hand, it would seem that the performance gains made over the i5-13600K are not quite as evident as one would expect. As a direct result of this, it is projected that the pricing will continue to be the same as it was for the model during the year before to this one.

This may be mostly attributable to the core configuration, which has been carried over from the i5-13600K and consists of 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores respectively. This configuration has been carried over from the i5-13600K. This setup was formerly used with the i5-13600K and has been preserved here.

This configuration was formerly used with the i5-13600K, and it has been kept here for historical purposes. Intel upped the maximum clock speeds from 5.1 to 5.3 GHz, despite the fact that the new i5 does not support Turbo Boost or Thermal Velocity Boost. This was made possible by raising the frequency at the basic level. Since yesterday, the maximum clock rates have been extended all the way up to 5.3 GHz.

Despite the fact that the most current version of the i5 CPU does not have support in its specifications for any of the technologies discussed above, this is the case. The thermal design power, often known as TDP, of the Intel Core i5-14600K is initially configured to be 125 watts. In order to boost the clock speed of the CPU to 5.3 GHz, the thermal design power (TDP) will need to be increased to 160 watts.

According to the findings of the firm’s testing, the voltage of the engineering sample that ECSM analysed was much more than 1.4 volts. This was established by the company. Possible solutions to this issue include making an investment in a motherboard of high quality that also has the capability of undervolting your computer’s components.

The performance of the Intel Core i5-14600K was determined to be 8% better on a single core and 14% better across multiple cores when compared to the performance of the Intel Core i5-13600K when assessed with the new Cinebench 2024 suite. In addition, the performance of the Intel Core i5-14600K was 14% better overall. When comparing the two CPUs, this was the point when there was the most noticeable improvement in performance.

During the process of doing their benchmarks, ECSM took use of not just the tried-and-true Cinebench R23 and CPU-Z tests, but also the brand new Cinebench 2024 suite. CPU-Z showed that there was a 6% improvement in the performance of the single core, however Cinebench R23 demonstrated that there was only a 4% improvement in the performance of the multi-core. The Cinebench R23 benchmark, on the other hand, showed the least amount of improvement, with results that were very close to 0% for the single core test and 3% for the multi-core test.

News source