Contents [hide]
In this blog, we’ll go over issues including what serverless computing is, how it operates, and its Advantages And Disadvantages Of Serverless Computing.
What is Serverless computing?

Software developers can create and operate servers and apps using serverless computing, a cloud computing execution model, without having to supply or maintain the back-end infrastructure. Serverless infrastructure management includes patching, OS upgrades, security management, system monitoring, and capacity planning by the cloud provider.
Serverless computing developers pay-as-they-go for cloud back-end services. Serverless computing aims to simplify cloud platform code writing for developers.
How serverless computing works
Developers no longer have to worry about cloud machine instance management due to serverless computing. Instead, they don’t need to configure or manage the servers because they can run code on cloud servers. Instead of using pre-purchased units of capacity, pricing is determined by the actual quantity of resources used by an application.
When developers use cloud-based virtual servers to host their apps, they usually have to install operating systems, monitor, and update the software on these servers.
Developers can create a function in their preferred programming language and upload it to a serverless platform using a serverless architecture. In addition to mapping the function to an application programming interface (API) endpoint and transparently scaling function instances on demand, the cloud service provider also oversees the software and infrastructure.
Why make use of serverless computing?
Comparing serverless computing to conventional cloud-based or server-centric infrastructure reveals several benefits. Many developers find serverless architectures more flexible, faster to release, and cheaper to scale. Serverless architectures free developers from buying, setting up, and managing backend servers. Serverless computing doesn’t solve web application development problems.
Serverless Computing Elements
The Elements of virtual resources that make up serverless computing include:
Serverless stack
As a result of serverless computing, serverless stacks have evolved, bringing together the many parts that businesses use to create their serverless applications. The programming language used to write the code, the application framework that provides the code with structure, and the triggers that the platform utilizes to comprehend and start code execution are all contained in each stack.
Serverless frameworks
How developers construct an application is determined by the framework they use to organize their code. Open-source frameworks and cross-platform models are among the possibilities available. These include Apex, Serverless, and the open-source Serverless Application Model (SAM) from Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Databases without servers
Serverless computing eliminates the necessity for programming to have a persistent state that must be kept somewhere. Serverless databases that integrate with developers’ tasks and delegate backups, maintenance, replication, and scaling are provided by major vendors.
Containers
Serverless technology is powered by vendor-managed containers, such the orchestration platform Kubernetes. However, the advantages of containerized microservices can also be obtained without the hassle of administering them with serverless computing.
Serverless offline testing
At first glance, launching a serverless computing project may seem daunting and a significant investment. On the other hand, local capabilities like serverless-offline and AWS’ SAM allow developers to test their code offline on their own local hardware.
Advantages and disadvantages of serverless computing

Advantages of serverless computing
Cost-effectiveness
On a serverless computing platform, users and developers only pay for the time that code executes. They do not charge for virtual machines (VMs) that are not in use.
Easy deployment
Instead of weeks or months, developers may release apps in a matter of hours or days.
Autoscaling
When the code is not executing, cloud providers manage scaling up or spinning down instances or resources.
DevBoost
Instead of wasting time on servers and runtimes, developers can devote the majority of their time to creating and building programs.
Disadvantages of serverless computing
Vendor lock-in
Because serverless services can be supplied differently by different vendors, switching cloud providers may be challenging.
Unsuitable
Employing long-running processes can occasionally be far more expensive than employing a dedicated server or virtual machine.
Latency
A cold start is the term used to describe the delay that occurs when a scalable serverless platform handles a function for the first time.
Complex
Debugging and fixing a serverless function is challenging because a serverless instance generates a new version of itself every time it runs up.
Serverless vs. other cloud back-end models
Here’s a comparison table the differences between IaaS, PaaS, and BaaS, along with serverless computing:
Feature | IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) | PaaS (Platform as a Service) | BaaS (Backend as a Service) | Serverless Computing |
---|---|---|---|---|
Payment Model | Pre-purchase capacity; pay for server components that are always on. | Pay a fixed monthly fee for services, regardless of usage. | Typically subscription-based, sometimes usage-based for API calls. | Pay only for what is used; costs incurred per execution or event. |
Scalability | Manual scaling; depends on the organization’s estimation of resource needs. | Scaling parameters need to be set by developers. | Limited automatic scaling; some platforms have request-per-second limitations. | Automatic, demand-based scaling without developer intervention. |
Developer Control | High control over infrastructure (e.g., VM, storage, and networks). | Moderate control over deployment environments but abstracted infrastructure. | Minimal control; backend operations are managed by the provider. | Minimal control; only the application code and event triggers are managed by developers. |
Trigger/Event-Driven | Not event-driven; infrastructure is always running. | Not inherently event-driven; requires configuration. | Typically not event-driven; backend services are pre-configured. | Fully event-driven; resources allocated only when triggered by an event. |
Ease of Use | Requires knowledge of infrastructure setup and management. | Easier than IaaS; developers focus on applications without managing infrastructure. | Very simple; focuses on backend services like authentication, storage, or API management. | Easiest; developers focus solely on writing and deploying application code triggered by events. |
Cost Predictability | Predictable; based on capacity purchased, but may include underutilization costs. | Predictable; flat fee regardless of usage. | Moderately predictable; depends on subscription plans and usage limits. | Unpredictable; depends on the number of events triggered and operations performed. |
Use Cases | Large-scale applications requiring full infrastructure control and customization. | Custom application development where developers need pre-built tools but control over scaling and configurations. | Mobile and web app development requiring rapid backend setup, e.g., authentication, database management. | Event-driven applications, microservices, real-time data processing, or occasional workloads. |
Responsibility for Setup | Organization’s tech team handles setup, scaling, and maintenance of infrastructure. | Developers handle app setup and environment configurations. | Backend management is handled by the BaaS provider; minimal developer responsibility for setup. | Managed entirely by the cloud provider; developers focus on code deployment and event configuration. |